Digital-Intelligent Transformation and Corporate ESG Performance: The Mediating Roles of Internal Control Quality and Financing Constraints

Authors

  • Haoyi Chen International Business College, Dongbei University Oof Finance and Economics, Dalian, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/zg854x20

Keywords:

Digital-intelligent transformation; Corporate ESG performance; Internal control quality; Financing constraints; Sustainable development; Corporate governance.

Abstract

With the rapid development of digital technologies, digital-intelligent transformation has become an important pathway for firms to achieve sustainable development. This study investigates the impact of digital-intelligent transformation on corporate ESG performance and further examines the underlying mechanisms through which this relationship operates. Using panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies during 2010–2023, this study constructs a two-way fixed effects model to empirically examine the relationship between digital-intelligent transformation and corporate ESG performance. The findings demonstrate that digital-intelligent transformation significantly improves corporate ESG performance, indicating that digital technologies can effectively promote firms’ sustainable development. Mechanism analyses reveal that internal control quality and financing constraints serve as important transmission channels: digital-intelligent transformation enhances ESG performance by strengthening internal governance capabilities and alleviating financing constraints. Further robustness tests, including alternative measurements of key variables and different sample specifications, confirm the reliability of the results. Additional heterogeneity analyses indicate that the positive effect of digital-intelligent transformation on ESG performance varies across ownership structures and industry characteristics. This study contributes to the literature on digital transformation and corporate sustainability by revealing the governance and resource allocation mechanisms through which digital technologies facilitate ESG improvement. The findings provide practical implications for firms and policymakers seeking to promote sustainable development through digital innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Eccles R G, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance[J]. Management scie

[2] Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies[J]. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 2015, 5(4): 210-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

[3] Bai C, Dallasega P, Orzes G, et al. Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective[J]. International journal of production economics, 2020, 229: 107776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776

[4] Feroz A K, Zo H, Chiravuri A. Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(3): 1530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530

[5] Verhoef P C, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, et al. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda[J]. Journal of business research, 2021, 122: 889-901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

[6] Freeman R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675

[7] Appelbaum D, Kogan A, Vasarhelyi M, et al. Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting[J]. International journal of accounting information systems, 2017, 25: 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.003

[8] Ashbaugh‐Skaife H, Collins D W, Kinney Jr W R, et al. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies on firm risk and cost of equity[J]. Journal of Accounting research, 2009, 47(1): 1-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00315.x

[9] Healy P M, Palepu K G. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature[J]. Journal of accounting and economics, 2001, 31(1-3): 405-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0

[10] Bo L, Li H, Zhang S, et al. Digital transformation and financing constraints: evidence from Chinese manufacturing multinational enterprises[J]. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 2025, 3(1): 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-025-00054-9

[11] Myers S C, Majluf N S. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have[J]. Journal of financial economics, 1984, 13(2): 187-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0

[12] Warner K S R, Wäger M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long range planning, 2019, 52(3): 326-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001

Downloads

Published

21-10-2026

How to Cite

Chen, H. (2026). Digital-Intelligent Transformation and Corporate ESG Performance: The Mediating Roles of Internal Control Quality and Financing Constraints. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 70, 518-528. https://doi.org/10.54097/zg854x20