Construction of Urban Infrastructure Resilience Evaluation Index System and Application of Multi-criteria Decision-making Model

Authors

  • Zeyu He School of Professional Studies, New York University, USA, 10012.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fc0w0e50

Keywords:

Analytic Hierarchy Process; Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution; Multi-criteria decision-making model; Urban infrastructure systems.

Abstract

The rising level of potential threats to urban infrastructure due to more frequent phenomena of extreme weather events, rapid urbanization, and complex interconnect of critical infrastructure elements has demanded a more extensive effort to be put towards assessing this resilience. To address this increasing need for a more scientific assessment of resilience, this research presents a composite indicator approach along with a multi-criteria analysis model combining Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference and Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). After a thorough literature examination and expert consultation, six major criteria and eighteen elementary factors are used for a comprehensive assessment of infrastructure resilience. The results are tested for the city of Wuhan in China using a statistical model. Analysis points out that a relatively strong level of resilience in regard to transportation and power infrastructure exists in Wuhan but with vulnerable Information & Communication Technology infrastructure, Emergency Response Services infrastructure, and Water Supply infrastructure because of factors such as oldness of infrastructure, inhomogeneous population coverage levels, and strong environmental dependencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Liu W., Shan M., Zhang S., Zhao X., Zhai Z. Resilience in infrastructure systems: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 79: 103698.

[2] Wang L., Xue X., Wang Z., Zhang L. A unified assessment approach for urban infrastructure sustainability and resilience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 171: 1275–1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2073968

[3] Fu X., Hopton M. E., Wang X. Assessment of green infrastructure performance through an urban resilience lens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2021, 210: 104084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125146

[4] Asghari F., Piadeh F., Egyir D., Yousefi H., Rizzuto J. P., Campos L. C., Behzadian K. Resilience assessment in urban water infrastructure: A critical review of approaches, strategies and applications. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 344: 118580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.1348.v1

[5] Rezvani S. M. H. S., Falcão Silva M. J., Marques de Almeida N. Urban resilience index for critical infrastructure: A scenario-based approach to disaster risk reduction in road networks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 98: 104123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104143

[6] Bouramdane A. A. Enhancing disaster management in smart cities through MCDM-AHP analysis amid 21st century challenges. Safety Science, 2024, 168: 106468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/issc.v3i1.189

[7] Jamali A., Robati M., Nikoomaram H., Farsad F., Aghamohammadi H. Urban resilience assessment using hybrid MCDM model based on DEMATEL–ANP method (DANP). Research Square, 2023 (Preprint). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4353743

[8] Janaćković G., Vranjanac Ž., Vasović D. Enhancing urban resilience: Integrating Actions for Resilience (A4R) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for sustainable urban development and proactive hazard mitigation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2025, 108: 105013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146408

[9] Chen M, Lu Y, Peng Y, Chen T, Zhang Y. Key elements of attentions for enhancing urban resilience: A Comparison of Singapore, Hong Kong and Hangzhou. Buildings. 2022, 12(3):340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030340

[10] Guo D., Shan M., Owusu E. K. Resilience assessment frameworks of critical infrastructures: State-of-the-art review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 63: 102446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100464

Downloads

Published

17-03-2026

How to Cite

He, Z. (2026). Construction of Urban Infrastructure Resilience Evaluation Index System and Application of Multi-criteria Decision-making Model. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 66, 19-26. https://doi.org/10.54097/fc0w0e50