A study on Innovation Quality in the Digital Transformation process

Authors

  • Ruoxuan Gao International College Beijing, China Argriculture University, Beijing, China, 100091

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/pyhdg846

Keywords:

Innovation Quality, Digital Transformation, Manufacturing Enterprises.

Abstract

In the context of global competition and rapid technological iteration, enhancing innovation quality has become a pressing issue for China’s manufacturing industry. Digital transformation, driven by emerging technologies, provides new opportunities for improving firms’ innovation capabilities. This study empirically investigates the relationship between digital transformation and innovation quality using panel data of Chinese A-share listed manufacturing enterprises from 2009 to 2024. The findings confirm that digital transformation significantly promotes innovation quality, with stronger effects in high-tech firms and enterprises located in eastern and central regions. The innovation of this paper lies in shifting the focus from innovation quantity to innovation quality, and in analyzing manufacturing enterprises as a unique sector with distinct innovation paths. This research not only enriches the theoretical understanding of digital transformation and innovation quality, but also provides practical implications for policymakers and enterprises seeking to leverage digitalization for sustainable industrial upgrading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhu W, Han W, Lu R, Lei J. The impact of enterprises’ scientific capabilities on innovation performance: Evidence from an empirical analysis and simulation model[J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025, 12: 4808.

[2] Ouyang R, Jing W, Liu Z, Tang A. Development of China’s digital economy: Path, advantages and problems[J]. Journal of Internet and Digital Economics, 2024, 4(3): 141-160.

[3] Liu X, Wang L. Digital transformation, ESG performance and enterprise innovation[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 23874.

[4] Kulykovets O. Transforming industries: The digital revolution of industry 4.0[J]. Issues in Information Systems, 2024, 25(3): 148-164.

[5] Teece D J, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533.

[6] Hajli N, Tajvidi M, Gbadamosi A, Nadeem W. Understanding market agility for new product success with big data analytics[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, 86: 135-143.

[7] Gattiker T F. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and the manufacturing–marketing interface: an information-processing theory view[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(13): 2895-2917.

[8] Kombaya Touckia J, Hamani N, Kermad L. Digital twin framework for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs): design and simulation[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 120(7-8): 5431-5450.

[9] Alexopoulos K, Nikolakis N, Xanthakis E. Digital transformation of production planning and control in manufacturing SMEs: The Mold Shop case[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(21): 10788.

[10] Burg N. Connecting content and structure: A review of mechanisms in entrepreneurs’ social networks[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2022, 24(2): 150-172.

[11] Wang Y, Li X, Liu J, Zhang W, Duan J. The impact of network positions in scientific collaboration on pharmaceutical firms’ technological innovation performance: Moderating roles of scientific collaboration strength and patent stock[J]. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022, 10: 980845.

[12] Shannon C E, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication[M]. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1949.

[13] Wang Y, Liu M. Impact of information characteristics on information adoption and public sector organizations success in China[J]. Profesional de la Información, 2024, 33(4): e330410.

[14] Jiang H, Gao S, Song Y, Sheng K, Amaratunga G A J. An empirical study on the impact of collaborative R&D networks on enterprise innovation performance based on the mediating effect of technology standard setting[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(24): 7249.

[15] Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H A. A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems[J]. Manufacturing Letters, 2015, 3: 18-23.

[16] García-Gil D, Luengo J, García S, Herrera F. From Big to Smart Data: Iterative ensemble filter for noise filtering in Big Data classification[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2019, 34(12): 3260-3274.

[17] Ettlie J E. Product-process development integration in manufacturing[J]. Management Science, 1995, 41(7): 1224-1237.

[18] Peteraf M A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(3): 179-191.

[19] Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120.

[20] Holdford D A. Resource-based theory of competitive advantage: A framework for pharmacy practice innovation research[J]. Pharmacy Practice, 2018, 16(3): 1351.

[21] Zhong R Y, Xu C, Klotz E, Newman S T. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: A review[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(5): 616-630.

[22] Warner K S R, Wäger M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2019, 52(3): 326-349.

[23] Guan J, Ma N. Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms[J]. Technovation, 2003, 23(9): 737-747.

[24] Wang W, Yin X, Coles R, Chen J. More knowledge, better innovation? Role of knowledge breadth and depth[J]. Management Decision, 2024, 62(5): 1576-1597.

[25] Zou L, Li W, Wu H, Liu J, Gao P. Measuring corporate digital transformation: Methodology, indicators and applications[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(10): 4087.

[26] Boh W F, Evaristo R, Ouderkirk A. Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(2): 349-366.

[27] Wang D, Xia X. The impact of corporate digital transformation on firms’ performance in utilities sector[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 10: e23362.

[28] Titov S, Trachuk A, Linder N, Pathak R D, Samson D, Husain Z Y, Sushil S N. Digital transformation enablers in high-tech and low-tech companies: A comparative analysis[J]. Australian Journal of Management, 2023, 48(4): 801-843.

Downloads

Published

17-03-2026

How to Cite

Gao, R. (2026). A study on Innovation Quality in the Digital Transformation process. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 66, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.54097/pyhdg846